2025 NFL Draft grades, tracker: Stay Spherical 4 evaluation for each choice made so as

The 2025 NFL Draft is right down to Day 3 after an thrilling and unpredictable two days, which started with the primary spherical on Thursday night time in Inexperienced Bay. Shockingly, Colorado’s Shedeur Sanders remains to be on the board after not being chosen within the first three rounds. Together with Sanders, there’s nonetheless some good prospects obtainable on Day 3. 

Spherical 4 started with a run on offensive playmakers, because the Titans snagged Florida vast receiver Chimere Dike, the Jaguars added Virginia Tech speedster Bhayshul Tuten and the Giants landed do-it-all working again Cameron Skattebo. Different notable picks embody defensive linemen Deone Walker (Payments, No. 108) and Ty Robinson (Eagles, No. 111).

Wish to know what I considered each decide made within the fourth spherical of the 2025 NFL Draft? You may learn beneath as I graded all of the Spherical 4 picks from Saturday. 

The fortunes of groups can change due to the draft and so can the betting market and Tremendous Bowl odds. What occurs the following few days may contribute to that. 

Make sure to refresh this web page all through the weekend to get all the most recent grades. If you wish to do all that plus observe the perfect obtainable prospects and get entry to each decide within the draft on one web page, you possibly can in our draft tracker. And comply with together with every decide in our dwell weblog and all of the trades in our commerce tracker.

Grades: Spherical 1 • Spherical 2 • Spherical 3 • Spherical 4 • Spherical 5 • Spherical 6 • Spherical 7

103. Titans: Chimere Dike, WR, Florida

Grade: C+

Decently sized speedster on the surface. Minimal YAC capacity relative to his pace. Older prospect. Physique management and suppleness are pluses to his profile. Struggles towards physicality at any level of the route however has strong ball-tracking ability. Simple drops appeared too continuously and he is not a pointy, inflexible route runner. I do like extra weaponry for Cam Ward, however there have been higher choices.

104. Jaguars: Bhayshul Tuten, RB Virginia Tech

Grade: A

My RB2. Burst, long-speed, critical elusiveness in a compact body. Ran a 4.32-second 40-yard sprint on the mix and it reveals on movie. Fumbles had been a transparent challenge in faculty, but it surely was a problem to search out one other flaw to his sport. Imaginative and prescient and phone stability are good, not nice. Huge-play ready to occur between the tackles and on exterior runs. Love this. 

105. Giants: Cameron Skattebo, RB, Arizona State

Grade: A

Suppose David Montgomery 2.0. Squatty, large lateral elusiveness. Contact stability galore. Runs with spectacular imaginative and prescient between the tackles. Clearly lacks pace. Emerged as a top quality pass-catcher, too. Gritty but athletic runner who will get greater than what’s blocked for him on a routine foundation. Excellent pairing with the explosive Tyrone Tracy Jr.

106. Patriots: Craig Woodson, S, Cal

Grade: A-

Defensive again who was ubiquitous on the Cal protection due to his athleticism and instincts, each which bounce off the movie. Uncommon to see him miss tackles in house, which is significant for a flexible security/cornerback kind. Not going to match sudden slot WRs but can perform every other obligation requested of him.

107. Jaguars: Jack Kiser, LB, Notre Dame

Grade: B+

One of many older prospects within the class, which caps his upside. Does all the pieces essentially sound on the linebacker place. Stays sq. to line of scrimmage, stacks and sheds like a veteran, and is among the most dependable tacklers on the place within the class. Not a premier athlete but holds his personal in protection when sinking in zone. Ball expertise may enhance. 

108. Raiders: Dont’e Thornton Jr., WR, Tennessee

Grade: A-

Almost 6-foot-5, 205-pound burner with 4.30 pace. And it reveals on movie. Averaged practically 22 yards per catch in faculty. Did play in vast open, vertical-based offense, which helped his numbers, but he can completely rip downfield. Area of interest kind with total rawness to his sport but provides a significantly harmful weapon for Geno Smith. Good complement to Jakobi Meyers and Jack Bech.

109. Payments: Deone Walker, DL, Kentucky

Grade: A

In 2023, he seemed like a first-rounder. Did not play to that degree in 2024. Poor exercise. Mammoth human on the inside who strikes like he is three inches shorter and 30 kilos lighter. Younger with pass-rushing potential due to his first-step quicks and counter transfer tendencies. Excessive pad degree saps energy, and although he has plus size, he does not use it constantly sufficient. Wants to enhance run-stopping consistency, too. Payments deal with the 1T place in an enormous method, actually

110. Jets: Arian Smith, WR, Georgia

Grade: C+

Possibly the receiver with essentially the most pure juice off the ball and downfield within the class. Completely flies. And demonstrated above-average route snap when altering instructions. Not an enormous YAC kind. Has main points catching the soccer — in visitors or when vast open. If that may be ironed out and he can get stronger to cope with physicality, this could be a high quality decide. 

111. Eagles: Ty Robinson, DL, Nebraska

Grade: B

Cross-rushing DT with a thick, chiseled body. Elite tester on the mix. Robust higher physique. Wants so as to add extra pop from his decrease half. Rushes are sometimes excessive. Demonstrated strong hand work. Units a robust edge in run help. Nothing spectacular about his sport, however the pass-rush glimmers and body are intriguing. 

112. Saints: Danny Stutsman, LB, Oklahoma

Grade: C+

Tall, well-proportioned LB who was on the draft radar for years but did not showcase a lot enchancment from his sophomore to senior yr. Misses too many tackles and by no means developed into a top quality protection kind. However has supreme vary and a big tackling radius. The Saints have to plan for the longer term at linebacker after DeMario Davis. 

113. 49ers: CJ West, DL, Indiana

Grade: A

No-nonsense nasty run defender with energy and stack-shed capacity of an NFL veteran. Can get lateral however is greatest in pure one-on-one conditions moving into the backfield. Spectacular twitch and mix exercise to again it up. Superior stability. Three-down kind. Love this. 

114. Panthers: Trevor Etienne, RB, Georgia

Grade: B-

Younger, effortlessly elusive RB with perfect stocky body. He can shift gears in a flash as soon as he is in house and does not have a variety of mileage on his legs. Some imaginative and prescient points however doubtless attributable to inexperience. Good contact stability. Related RB to Chuba Hubbard. 

115. Cardinals: Cody Simon, LB, Ohio State

Grade: C+

Simon is a jack of all trades, grasp of none. In all probability greatest as tackler. Athletic however nothing spectacular in that regard. Has loads of room for enchancment in ball-skills division however demonstrated high quality protection instincts and consciousness. Block-shedding wants work but is a weapon as a blitzer. 

116. Texans: Woody Marks, RB, USC

Grade: D+

Head-scratcher. Marks is not a brutal RB, however this was a large overpayment on the draft decide commerce chart. Not overly elusive nor speedy downfield. Common-at-best athlete. Contact stability is sweet, not nice. Older prospect. Clear want behind Joe Mixon, but this was unusual.

117. Rams: Jarquez Hunter, RB, Auburn

Grade: A

Chiseled, high-energy, super-productive SEC RB with the slicing ability and phone stability to thrive within the NFL. Imaginative and prescient of an skilled runner. Sharp cuts. Love his North-South method. One other good Rams choice. My comparability was mockingly Kyren Williams.

118. Falcons: Billy Bowman Jr., S, Oklahoma

Grade: C+

Small, twitched-up security who desires to be a part of the energetic typically. There are glimmers of Budda Baker to his sport, but he is woefully extra inconsistent. Misses large quantity of tackles and simply overwhelmed by blockers. Excessive vitality. Instincts and ball expertise are good and at instances nice.

119. Bengals: Barrett Carter, LB, Clemson

Grade: C

Veteran LB who was on the draft radar for years but by no means constructed on a stellar begin to his Clemson profession. Whereas he performs extra athletically than his exercise, he is not a freaky specimen, though his vary will meet thresholds. Protection fluidity and ball expertise are there. Heady participant sometimes in the proper place. Tackling wants to enhance. One other linebacker?

120. Titans: Gunnar Helm, TE, Texas

Grade: B-

Performs extra athletically than his mix exercise — when he was injured — but not a super-smooth nor extraordinarily quick kind on the place. Will not be a routine separator. Nifty, bouncy expertise after the catch. Will create after making beneath grabs. He’ll be a dependable goal due to restricted drops on movie, too. 

121. Buccaneers: David Walker, EDGE, Central Arkansas

Grade: A-

Ridiculous movie and manufacturing on the FBS degree. Squatty with brief arms however performs with critical bend and has a implausible repertoire of pass-rush strikes. Will get overwhelmed at instances, however his low middle of gravity permits him to play with shocking energy. Good decide so as to add depth to the defensive finish place, which was clear want on this group. 

122. Panthers: Lathan Ransom, S, Ohio State

Grade: B-

Deep security with a methodical method. Good play diagnoses, which permit him to play quicker than his measured pace. Whereas there are enjoyable strikes on movie, his tackling is generally inconsistent as a result of he goals for these big hits too typically. Finest in robber function and can play accountability sound.

123. Steelers: Jack Sawyer, EDGE, Ohio State

Grade: A

Basic Steelers decide. Sawyer is not a premier athlete by any stretch, and there are too many cases when he is pushed off the ball, but he will get essentially the most out of each ounce of his athleticism due to high quality hand work and continuous hustle. Glimmers of bend across the nook, and he works arduous to set a sturdy edge vs. the run. Logical EDGE depth in Pittsburgh.

124. Packers: Barryn Sorrell, EDGE, Texas

Grade: B-

Slippery EDGE with common measureables, however the finesse aspect of the sport down pat. Will not win with burst or speed-to-power conversion, which is a matter. Squeezes by gaps with good regularity. Would not hate to see him bulk as much as develop into a nickel rusher on the inside at instances. Very by-the-book Packers decide.

125. Chargers: Kyle Kennard, EDGE, South Carolina

Grade: C

Tall, high-energy EDGE with high quality burst however clear-cut stiffness that severely hinders his capacity to threaten on the surface. Poor testing aligns with the movie. The attract comes from his towering body and extremely lengthy arms. Must play decrease to generate energy. This decide comes after a run on the place however nonetheless feels early.

126. Browns: Dylan Sampson, RB, Tennessee

Grade: C

Explosive, one-cut and go RB. Performed in wide-open scheme in faculty, which supplied big dashing lanes. Moderately elusive but not a transparent power; similar is true along with his contact stability. One other RB for a rebuilding group?

127. Colts: Jalen Travis, OT, Iowa State

128. Commanders: Jaylin Lane, WR, Virginia

129. Ravens: Teddye Buchanan, LB, Cal

130. Eagles

131. Saints

132. Payments

133. Chiefs

134. Broncos

135. Raiders

136. Ravens

137. Seahawks

138. 49ers